Saturday, July 14, 2012

A Keyboard Instrument in Action

Early Keyboards in Israel: Reportage from the Field

First published at FoMRHI Quarterly Communications 116 (2010), 8-14


A Challenge

“Hi, Alex, looking for challenge?” Zami’s voice is full of friendly intrigue. “Then write down a phone number!”

I’ve known Zami Ravid, an Israeli collector of musical instruments, since the early 1990s; four different keyboards from his collection have passed through my workshop.

The challenge was to correctly tune an old cimbalom given as a present to an eighty-year-old female resident of Jerusalem, who learned to play it in Hungary when she was six and had not touched it since then. Instruments of this kind have always been rare in Israel, and during the late 1990s, the Internet did not provide easy access to information on their tuning. Of course, encyclopedic sources could be found, but I had already devised a plan of action.

Upon my arrival, I questioned the owner about songs that she might remember to play. I was lucky; among the tunes—most of which were of Hungarian gypsy origin—was a Hebrew melody Yerushalayim shel zahav (“Golden Jerusalem”), which both of us knew. Then, I asked her to play it as though the cimbalom were in tune. She succeeded in doing that, and I noticed the strings’ positions that corresponded with certain notes from the melody and the accompaniment. The scale sequence and octave division in both the treble and bass sections of the instrument were completed, in general, from the first attempt. Much later, however, I checked this topic through the Internet, and one of the suggested options was indeed very close to my tuning plan.

This exotic story serves as just one example of unique professional challenges we meet in our careers, not routine problems. Challenges, however, also await us in more ordinary circumstances, as we will see below.

The following pages will contain some general notes on early keyboards in Israel, and several selected stories from my experience of their restoration in the last twenty years.

A working space

A maintainer and restorer of early keyboards in Israel can cover a range of different instrument groups. There are, first of all, harpsichords of historical building and of revivals. The latter were brought by newcomers in the early 1960s; others were ordered from European builders during the 1980s, when a trend demanding authentic performance reached the country. Many educational institutions—music academies, universities, and conservatories—acquired historical harpsichords, spinets and virginals during that period and the following decades. Above eighty instruments of this kind are presently located in Israel.

Reed organs (harmoniums), brought to the Holy Land in the nineteenth century by missionaries and left for decades without maintenance, have now become rather exotic features of households. Some of them have been under my care. In churches, however, these instruments have finally become obsolete; either pipe or electric church organs have replaced them all.

Small pipe organs (positives) acquired by several music institutions in the last two decades serve continuo goals. They all are in playable condition.

Early pianos have been represented until now by four period square-pianos, only one of which is in playable condition, and four fortepianos of historical building.

Local problems

There are two problems regarding early keyboards—first of all, harpsichords—in Israel: hamsin and irregular maintenance. The first problem is caused by a weather phenomenon specific to this geographic area. Fifty days a year (hamsin means fifty in Arabic), a southern wind from the desert brings a heavy combination of temperature, barometric and humidity factors; people suffer from headaches, and frames of paintings are bent. Likewise, string instruments become out of tune, and a harpsichord soundboard may receive a wave-like shape seen by eye. After several years, such repeated events may cause unconvertible damage to the soundboard. Most historical harpsichords with a string length of c'' close to 36 cm (for soft iron stringing) or 38 cm (for steel wire stringing) become seriously damaged after only fifteen years. Though this problem has been resolved in recent years due to the prevalence of air conditioning, the lasting solution of the problem is reducing the general string tension—that is, tuning the instrument half a tone lower, and building by this occasion the transposing keyboard, if it is not already constructed. This routine operation stabilizes many instruments and keeps them in tune.

The second problem, however, is much more serious and caused by a human factor. Many local harpsichord owners generally do not take the necessary steps to maintain their instruments. Several times, I have been called to evaluate a harpsichord that has not received a maintenance check in ten to fifteen years, though an overhaul was needed and the maintainer’s name on the small sticker was almost unreadable.

Combinations of these two problems, to varying degrees of seriousness, create the range of my “routine practice.” Sometimes, however, there are no routine situations, as described in the following pages.

A reed organ

Zami Ravid knows to excite me each time he calls. This time, there was a small reed organ, harmonina, which he brought from France. My task was to rebuild the completely destroyed bellows.

Harmonina, an invention of Alexandre-François Debain, a mid-nineteenth century French builder, is a three-octave, foot-pump harmonium that works on the rather rare pressure principle.1 Regarding the bellows, there was indeed little physical information left to study. For hours, I sat opposite the bellows to investigate them, as I attempted to follow the hypothetical technical thoughts of the original builder. In other words, I was calculating how I would build—from the beginning—bellows of that particular shape and size.

The next day, I devoted my time to searching for the appropriate materials—cardboard, thin leather, tappets—in different Jerusalem stores and workshops. Then, for the following two days, I completed the project, step by step (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Some steps in building the bellows

Fig. 2. Restored harmonina

The final touch was to correctly place colored tappets onto the bells, in order to appropriate the external design of the receiver part in the front side of the instrument. Other parts of the reed organ were in quite good condition. Except for cleaning the voices and other minor repairs, no work needed to be carried out. Harmonina, according to its builder’s concept, was designed as a melodic keyboard to be placed in front of a piano keyboard, so that the pianist’s right hand might play a melody with it, while the left hand performs the piano accompaniment. The octave span of the instrument, hence, was the same as in most contemporary pianos, i.e., 165 mm. The harmonina (Fig. 2) is presently working and being exhibited at “Zami's Music Box” Museum, Metula, Israel.



A square-piano

The earliest keyboard I repaired to playable condition, as it remains now, was a square-piano built by Baas, Paris, in 1800 (Fig. 3). Dr. Myrna Herzog, a specialist for Gamba, has recently possessed this instrument. In 1972, Johannes Carda restored the piano, having replaced the strings and dampers for new ones based on the initial design. Since then, the instrument has neither been played nor maintained.

Fig. 3. Square-piano “Baas”

Of course, there were many regulations and other repairs to complete, but the most important and essential points were as follows:

1) choosing an appropriate pitch;

2) bringing into order the quantity of pedals and their correct functioning; and

3) protecting the bottom parts of the pedal mechanisms during transportation.



The original pitch of the instrument was certainly unknown. When it arrived at the customer’s house, the pitch was approximately a'=380 Hz. The string length of c'' was about 32 cm. The range of possibilities, therefore, might be set between a'=420460 Hz. The currently accepted pitch for early fortepianos, a'=430 Hz, did not meet ensemble realities in Israel; a possible tuning to a'=440 Hz would perhaps be dangerous because of the soundboard's condition and the age of the instrument. The solution was a'=415 Hz. After one month of tuning the instrument at that pitch, it became stable.

Fig. 4. The new scheme of pedals

The four originally designed pedals were capable of the following stops and functions (from left to right): piano, sustain, lute, and bell. The bell was missing, while the rest were complete. After some hesitation, we decided—together with my customer—to cancel the right pedal, and to arrange the rest in more a convenient order for use, from left to right: piano, lute, and sustain (Fig. 4.).

To protect the bottom sections, I added two square beams rounded off by sides, so that the square-piano might be easily pushed into and pulled out of a minivan.

A revival harpsichord

One of my customers, an amateur whose living circumstances did not allow him to purchase a historical harpsichord of normal length and keyboard compass, asked me to prepare a revival harpsichord “Ammer” (8' + 4"), so that he could play a Bach Allemande, the first bars of which include the low B-flat. I started to work on changing the keyboard sequence and planned to insert a BB key instead of f'''; I was also requested to build a transposing keyboard.

Fig. 5. Reconstructed “Ammer”

When I finished the ordered modification, my customer suddenly discovered that this Allemande also includes the low A. He asked me then to insert additional two low notes (instead of the upper D-sharp and E). I had to insert an additional bass string for each register, to move the jack guides by one position, to build a new portion of the key frame and to change the pitchone tone lower. The c'' length then became 36 (instead of 38) cm. I did not even change the steel strings for soft iron, though I did change the plectra (of only 8') from leather to Delrin.2 The instrument, previously painted by Jerusalem artist Julia Lagus, is displayed in Fig. 5.

A historical harpsichord

When I receive a call regarding a harpsichord of symbolical value, I usually investigate the situation immediately. Several years ago, I discovered a Mitchell one-manual French instrument of the late 1970s. I have known William Mitchell, a harpsichord builder, since the mid-1990s. He is one of the most knowledgeable harpsichord experts I have ever met. There are at least five Mitchell harpsichords located in Israel.

The instrument was stored inappropriately, and its condition was really deplorable. I decided to elevate this instrument, modest by its exterior look, to a better condition more appropriate to its noble essence.



Fig. 6. Taskin's damper shape

Fig. 7 Mitchell-Rosenblatt harpsichord

The process of designing a new look, ordering parts, and carrying out the necessary works required about one year. I had to replace a section of the strings in the short octave for those of another width in order to obtain more equal sound. I changed neither the original—narrow—space between the neighbor strings, nor the rarely used damper shape designed after Tascin's model (Fig. 6), i.e., the features provided a maximal plectra length (6.5 mm), very soft damping, and resonance from the inactivated register. The transposing keyboard (a'=415–440 Hz) received an additional position at a'=392 Hz. The new lute buffs made of soft felt now function on the rear 8' register. New legs, a music stand, moldings around the case, and a rose on the soundboard substantially enriched the exterior. The lit painting, a night panorama of old Jaffa made by Safed artist Masha Orlovich, lent the instrument an authentic nuance, being a “local motif” characteristic for lit paintings of keyboard instruments during the Renaissance and Baroque periods. The “last cord” was a name board with the two names of the builders. The instrument is now in the condition visible in Fig. 7.

Fade out

“Hi, Alex, looking for challenge?” The clear voice of Natalie, a red-haired harpsichordist, is full of friendly intrigue. “My spinet…”

I have to go, and my readers will not know what kind of experience is waiting for me this time. However, you already know that even though we do not seek challenges, they are waiting for us, for people whose everyday lives are so closely connected to previous centuries.

For restorers of musical instruments.





1. For details on this principle, see: A. Rosenblatt, ‘A Keyboard Instrument in a Photograph. A Reed Organ at the House of German Clergy in Jerusalem: Meditating on a Photograph from the late 1920s,’ FoMRHI Quarterly 114, November 2009, p. 12.

2. As an example of an “unconsidered human factor,” this story may provide information for determining how to handle complicated cases regarding rebuilt musical instruments. For such a case, see: A. Rosenblatt, ‘A Keyboard Instrument in a Museum. A Rebuilt Italian Harpsichord at the Metropolitan Collection (NY): Restoring a Chain of Events’, FoMRHI Quarterly 115, March 2010.

Friday, July 13, 2012

A Keyboard Instrument in a Museum

A Rebuilt Italian Harpsichord at the Metropolitan Collection (NY):
Restoring a Chain of Events

First published at FoMRHI Quarterly Communications 115 (2010), 31-40


Have you ever come across a mystery that would excite you for years afterwards? And did you finally feel a need to puzzle it out?

This paper is about that

Attending the Metropolitan

In the late 1990s, I visited the Metropolitan Museum. My special interest was the collection of musical instruments. The National Collection contained thousands of musical instruments of different kinds and countries of origin, including about 50 keyboards. Among the latter were exemplars such as a harpsichord converted to a fortepiano, the earliest of extant Cristofori fortepianos, and two harpsichords with three unison (8') string sets. One of them, Nr. 45.41 (Fig. 1), will be the subject of the following pages.

There has always existed the tendency to provide a harpsichord with additional equipment for enriching its sound with either over- or undertones or just for an option of another tone quality. Among the different rare features such as the 2' and 16' string sets, nasal (fagot) or leather (lute) registers, buff stops and even a third keyboard, the third unison string set is probably one of the most exotic design solutions in harpsichord building of the 18th century.

Fig. 1. Italian harpsichord at the Metropolitan, Catalogue Nr. 45.41

As we will see later, this instrument has been rebuilt and there were many uncertainties about its initial disposition or possible further changes. Nowadays, we cannot imagine that somebody would change the compass of, say, a concert Steinway, but rebuilding keyboard instruments was typical in the 18th century. As a practicing restorer and rebuilder of early keyboards, with experience of changing string types and keyboard compasses, I would try to restore the chain of events that might have passed over that instrument. My starting point is to suppose the unusual human stories behind the unusual technical solutions. Another point is that we often follow paradigms for evaluations and opinions; sometimes, however, we have to change our mind to gain more truthful picture. I will build my essay by combining different perceptions of the subject (in addition to the first glance of a visitor): curator, conservator, restorer, writer and, finally, rebuilder.

I would like to acknowledge J. Kenneth (Ken) Moore, Associate Curator & Administrator in the Department of Musical Instruments at the Metropolitan Museum, and Henriques Caldeira, conservator in the department, for their generous and substantial contribution to the work on this material.

Catalogue Information1

Department: Musical Instruments

Object Name: Harpsichord

Classification: Chordophone-Zither-plucked-harpsichord

Label Text: This harpsichord has three sets of unison strings, one of which is plucked at a point very closed to the nut so as to give a brighter timbre than the others.2 The mermaid holding one of the supporting columns is a device of the Colonna family. The painting inside the lid shows a landscape with a duck hunter. The conventionalized foliage and the aerial perspective have the flavor of the work of Gaspard Dughet, brother-in-law of Nicolas Poussin, who painted chiefly in Rome.

Date Label: Late 17th century

Country of Origin: Italy, Southern, Europe

Medium: Wood, various materials

Description: Inner-outer case, inner of cypress or cedar with spruce or fir soundboard, present compass AA-c''', 3x8', probably enlarged from C/E-c''' 2x8'; pin-block, nuts and registers possibly not original; interior much altered; in painted outer case on 3 columnar legs, front 2 supporting crowned mermaid, signia of the Colonna family.

Dimensions: Inner case: L. w/o moldings 227.8 cm (89-11/16 in.), L. w/moldings 231.2 cm (91-7/16 in.); W. w/o moldings 79.7 cm (31.3/8 in.), W. w/moldings: 81.5 cm (32-1/16 in.); D.24.8 cm (9-3/4 in.); Octave span: c-b2 cm 49.9 cm (19-11/16 in.)

Mark(s): Marked (on interior): Restored to playing condition for Miss S. D. Bliss in August & September Nineteen Forty. By Ernst Schlesinger & Fred J. Markert New York City N. Y.

Notes: Pinblock and nuts not original, compass perhaps changed (John van der Meer, October 1976). Dating changed from XVII century to XVIII century; Rome added; paintings attributed to Gaspard Dughet, probably. The crowned mermaid and column supports indicate that the harpsichord was made for the Colonna family.

A Range of Opinions3

This harpsichord is of the traditional Italian inner-outer type. Through study of the moldings, Denzil Wraight attributes it to Orazio Albana, whose known work is dated between 1628 and 1645.4 The instrument has undergone some alterations, and the original disposition is uncertain. The keyboard, now with compass AA to c''', has also been altered. Wraight concluded, on the evidence of an addition to the bass of the keyframe, that the original compass was GG/BB to c'''.5 The bottom seven key levers (AA to E-flat) are made of a different wood from the rest, which (excepting keys 46 and 52) are made of beech. This suggests the possibility that the original compass began on E (C/E) and extended to f'''.6 There are two nuts and one bridge. The nut closer to the player is at a higher level and carries two sets of strings. The strings of the lower nut, closer to the wrest plank, pass through slots in the higher nut. The three jackslides are marked P, S, and T (Primo, Secondo, Terzo) from front to back.

The present arrangement of the jacks is:


Fig. 2. String and jack arrangement of the Albana harpsichord.

Whether this arrangement is original, from a later rebuild, or from a twentieth-century restoration is uncertain. The present string lengths and plucking points are:

Table 1. String measurements, plucking points, and percentages of plucked string of the Albana harpsichord.7


< 8' upper level

8' > upper level

< 8' lower level

String length

plucking point (estimated)

% plucking point

String length

plucking point

% plucking point

String length

plucking point

% plucking point

c'''

143

62

43.3

133

44

33

119

45

37.8

c''

280

77

27.5

267

59

22

230

45

19.5

c'

559

102

18.2

530

84

15.8

485

47

9.7

c

1125

121

10.7

1069

103

9.6

1042

61

5.8

C

1833

139

7.5

1818

121

6.6

1767

89

5

Grant O'Brien has suggested that the lower level of strings, which in the treble are shorter than the longer upper-level set by a ratio of about 5:6, was intended for brass strings, while the upper-level strings would have been strung in iron.8 With the present keyboard compass, the upper-level string lengths (for example, c'' of the <8' is 280 mm long) are what one would expect for a brass-strung instrument at normal 8' pitch. Strung in iron, the pitch would be about a third higher, but if the keyboard originally ended on f''', with that key playing the strings now played by the c''' key of the present altered keyboard, the original pitch might have been close to the normal 8' level. The situation is more complicated, however, since marks on the wrest plank show that the two nuts were formerly closely spaced. [...] Wraight also notes that the moldings of the present nuts do not match the bridge, so they might have been replaced as well as moved. Even the soundboard might have been replaced, since other Albana instruments have cypress soundboards and this one is of spruce or fir, with the grain somewhat unusually placed at an angle with the spine rather than parallel to it.

The most that can be said is that the present disposition, compass, and scaling may stem from an eighteenth-century rebuilding. While it might have been strung with a mixture of brass and iron, as O'Brien suggests, another possibility is that it was intended to be strung entirely in brass. The upper-level strings could then be tuned to normal 8' pitch, while the lower-level strings would have been tuned to a somewhat higher pitch. Thus, accompaniments could be transposed for different singers or instruments. One should note that the plucking points of lower-level strings, even when acted upon by the back set of jacks, are significantly closer than the plucking points of the upper-level strings. Thus, this register must have had a much more nasal tone quality in comparison with the others.

Technical Intermezzo

Well, opinions of experienced experts have diverged in almost all questions of principle concerning the harpsichord with a mermaid statue. Those and some additional aspects can be divided into four groups according to the chronological order of possible events:

1) Original disposition:

- compass of keyboard;

- material of strings; and

- pitch;

2) Reasons for rebuilding;

3) Initial plan of rebuilding:

- compass of keyboard;

- material of strings;

- pitch;

- destination of the third unison string set;

- design of the new wrest plank (position of the additional nut); and

- order and plucking direction of the new jack sets;

4) Later changes (leading to the present disposition).

In our attempt to restore the possible chain of events, we will take into account the following points of attitude:

1) Compass, string material and pitch of Italian harpsichords in the 17th and 18th centuries;

2) Lengths of the longest and shortest c'' (of the discussed instrument);

3) Initial position of low nut in the wrest plank.

4) The circumstances that might accompany the performing of rebuilding works; and

5) External factors such as the weather or quality of the string wire.

The information below was helpful to our search.

String material

Presently, most Italian harpsichords are disposed with two 8' choirs, and strung with brass, which was the norm in the late 17th and 18th centuries. Before about 1630, however, the most frequent disposition featured one 8' and one 4', and some instruments were designed with iron wire.9 It is possible that what we have come to appreciate as the 'traditional' Italian harpsichord with a short, brass-wire scale is in fact merely the restringing of a 16th-century, iron-wire scaled design.10

Pitch

Until recent times, there has been no common standard for pitches. Different pitches were circulating at different periods in different countries (Table 2).

Table 2. Selected pitches from the table by A.J.Ellis11

Pitch

Place

Year

Source

395.8

Versailles, France

1789

Organ of the palace chapel

409.0

Paris, France

1783

Tuning fork of Pascal Taskin, court tuner

441.0

Rome, Italy

1725

Pitch calculated from a flute made by Biglioni, Rome

422.5

London, England

1751

Handel's tuning fork

451.7

Milan, Italy

1867

La Scala Opera

454.08

London, England

1874

Old philharmonic pitch, instigated by Sir Charles Hall

Seventeenth century Italy had probably the widest range of pitches (in different cities), although there were, nevertheless, certain names for certain pitches:

tuono corista 408–409 Hz
tutto punto = 440–443 Hz
mezzo punto = 460–470 Hz12

Keyboard compass

The accepted compass standards of early Italian harpsichords were either C/E-c''' or C/E-f'''13.

String length

The main range for Italian 8' instruments was between about 255 mm and 360 mm measured at c''14. C/E-c''' compasses usually had short scales (averaging 266 mm), while C/E-f''' compasses were associated with long scales (averaging 327 mm). In our case, the lengths of the longest and shortest a' were, correspondingly, 28 and 23 cm. As a reminder, the optimal length (at a pitch of a'=440) for the soft Baroque iron is 36 cm, and 26 cm for the yellow brass wire15.

Quality of string wire

My experience has shown that brass string wires of a similar size produced by different manufacturers might have different breaking points (of more than half a tone).

Concepts to be and not to be concerned

The technical evidence of the seven keys (in the bass) made of different wood as against the marks of changing the key frame complicates the clarification of possible events. Of course, the seven keys could have been replaced for a simple reason. For instance, a scion of the Colonna family suddenly puts his arm on the waist of servant-maid, and she drops wet linen (or a saucepan) on the keyboard. As a result, several keys are totally damaged. Such versions, however, will not be regarded here. Now, I suppose that no 18th century builder would engage with an additional (unison) string set without the essential action of reducing the general tension. Therefore, the idea of the original AA/B-c''' compass with brass stringing will also receive little consideration. The marks of another initial placement of the second nut on the wrest plank allude to a story with pitches during the performing of the planned work on the instrument. Those are preliminary layouts to which both our ‘writer’ and ‘rebuilder’ will follow in their investigations into the possible chain of events.

Bellezza rossa

Buzz Buzz Buzz What a horrible sound! Alessandro Marella had a sorrowful glance at the last string to be replaced and slowly pressed the key: Denn Denn Denn The sound of a carefree childhood. The difference was so perceptible that tears filled the maker’s eyes.

A young brother of Giovanni Marella, an Italian composer favored by the French court, Alessandro was a cheerful guy who knew how to live within the moment and sought not to enter history. The brothers were distant relatives of Felice Colonna, a descendant from a powerful noble family in Medieval and Renaissance Rome. Alessandro was infatuated with Natalina, Felice’s young daughter, and the pretty red-haired girl, bellezza rossa, was also well disposed to him.

A while before, Colonna had acquired an old harpsichord. The instrument was in playable condition, but it lacked several low keys and thus did not truly suit contemporary music. Felice wanted to rebuild the harpsichord and entrusted the task to Alessandro who, however, had to first undertake professional studies with one of the specialists in the field. Colonna’s friend Gaspard Dughet, a French painter who chiefly worked in Rome and was the brother-in-law of the renowned artist Nicolas Poussin, recommended Pascal Taskin, a tuner of the French court, who was already well known for his work on Rueckers’ harpsichords. Giovanni talked to Taskin about his brother, and le maître approved of Alessandro’s arrival with an Italian clavicembalo to be rebuilt to the gravicembalo quality level. Thus, Alessandro traveled to Paris, and on the day before his departure, Natalina promised to marry him upon his return.

At the beginning, Taskin confided the three principles of rebuilding to his pupil. Everything you do must make sense. Be precise but know when to stop. Be original but don’t break existing rules. The harpsichord had to be rebuilt, restrung and tuned at a lower tone. For Marella, the new strings made of brass were a hidden sign of his love for bellezza rossa. Taskin permitted him to design an additional string set to also be strung in brass. This register might give the instrument a new-fashioned nasal timbre. For Alessandro, dreams of Natalina, who often became sick during the winter, were a part of this concept.

When the instrument was almost ready, something unexpected happened. Colonna sent them a flute by Biglioni with a short directive that the harpsichord must be tuned at that tone. The flute’s pitch was substantially higher than Taskin’s fork. Pourquoi? Taskin was truly puzzled; he knew that the low tone, tuono corista, was still commonly used in Rome. Your outstanding design will be lost! Marella, however, quickly caught the true meaning of this gesture; Ferro Felice, who was rather displeased with his daughter’s choice, was attempting to delay his return. Alessandro wrote to Natalina, telling her that there was nothing more important in his life than their love and asking her to wait for him. Week after week went by but no answer arrived.

The harpsichord was restrung again in iron. The Bellezza rossa register, though still in brass, lost its nasal timbre. It was now only the register that offered a bright, clear sound; the others became dark and dull. Taskin was no longer interested in that business.

After three months Marella finished his work and came back with the rebuilt instrument. The next day he learned that Natalina had gone to a monastery: she had received none of his letters and was full of despair. Alessandro would never know whose fault it was – the postman’s or her father’s.

Shortly thereafter, the instrument was painted by Gaspard Dughet, and a crown mermaid, a signia of the Colonna family, found its place near the front leg. It was already winter, and the weather was unusually cold that year. The brass strings raised their tone and commenced to break, one by one. Do something! commanded Colonna. A dream was broken. There was no more sense in maintaining the Bellezza rossa in brass.

Buzz Buzz Buzz The last string was replaced. Marella took a brief breath: a love was buried, but a mystery was born, a mystery of the third register, which was neither nasal nor bright. Just a senseless accessory…

Knock-knock-knock. Alessandro looked at the door and answered listlessly, Si. Suddenly, his face has brightened into the happiest smile: Natalina entered the room.

Post Scriptum

Italian harpsichord. Supposedly built by Orazio Albana, Rome, in the mid-17th century with a compass of C/E-f''' and two sets of iron strings at a pitch of around a'=460 (so-called mezzo punto). Planned to be rebuilt in the early 18th century with a new compass of A-c''' and brass stringing at a pitch around a'=408 (tuono corista). The lower tension of the new strings lent itself to putting an additional set of slightly shorter unison strings to be plucked by an additional row of jacks close to the nut, so as to give a fashioned then nasal register. A new wrest plank with two nuts was also designed.

Fig. 3. Italian harpsichord at the Metropolitan, Catalogue Nr. 45.41. A view from the front.

The circumstances have probably changed. A customer might give a rebuilder, as a sample of a wanted pitch, a wind instrument (or a fork) tuned at around 440 (tutto punto). One of nuts then must be moved to shorten the lengths of the third 8' to keep at least one string set at a clear brass sound. The rest were restrung in iron.

As a later step, some of the brass strings might not last the winter when the instrument raised its tone (because of the insufficient quality of the wire) and therefore the third 8' was restrung in iron. Since then, the instrument became just a ‘transposing continuo keyboard’ for different vocal and instrumental pitch solutions. Each one of its string sets might be tuned to a different pitch (up to a fifth higher than a'=440).



1. This material, compiled by L. Libin in 1985, has been kindly granted by Ken Moore.

2. 10 years ago, this phrase put me into a “mystery of the third unison string set”. I guessed that a timbre in that case might be rather nasal-like, and a short-scaled set might be supposedly strung in brass.

3. This review has been carried out by Susana Henriques Caldeira as a part of her MA thesis ‘An Italian Harpsichord Built About 1700: History, Design, and Conservation’, Department of Music in the Graduate School, The University of South Dakota, Vermillion, May 2004, pp. 93–96. Footnotes 4–9 below are a part of that paper – A.R.

4. Denzil Wraight, 'The Stringing of Italian Keyboard Instruments c. 1500 – c. 1650', Ph.D. dissertation, Queen's University of Belfast, 1997, part 2, 19.

5. Ibid.

6. Grant O'Brien, in his notes in the Metropolitan Museum files, suggests that the original compass was C/E to e'''.

7. Measurements from the file of the instrument at The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Some have been converted from measurements in inches. The upper-level < 8' plucking points are estimated from measurements of the 8' > plucking points.

8. O'Brien's conclusions are reported by Wraight, ‘The Stringing of Italian Keyboard Instruments’, part 2, 19.

9. Source: www.harpsichord-holland.com.

10. Denzil Wraight (www.denzilwraight.com).

11. Alexander J. Ellis."On the History of Musical Pitch," Journal of the Society of Arts, (March 5, 1880). Reprinted in Studies in the History of Music Pitch, Amsterdam: Frits Knuf, 1968.

12. Bruce Haynes, 'Pitch Standards in the Baroque and Classical Periods', Ph.D. thesis, University of Montréal, 1995; Folkers & Powell, Makers of Historical Flutes (www.baroqueflute.com).

13. John Shortridge, 'Harpsichord-Building in the 16th and 17th Centuries', United States National Museum Bulletin 225 paper 15 (1960, 2/1970).

14. Denzil Wraight (www.denzilwraight.com).

15. This follows Gerrit Klop’s table of harpsichord string lengths, which I copied to my notebook in the early 1990s.